Power to weight calculator

Discussion about MX5s, Roadsters & Miatas, not directly fitting into one of the categories below. Please keep it on topic.

Moderators: LilRay.Sun, Furai, Growler, zorruno, jif

Post Reply
WideOpenThrottle
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1293
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:35 am
Location: 36.8167° S, 174.4167° E

Power to weight calculator

Post by WideOpenThrottle » Fri Jul 05, 2013 7:21 pm

Just been told about this interesting site for those wanting to get an idea of where your car sits compared to others.

this is where mine currently sits...

Nissan 300ZX - (180)
Mitsubishi Evo VIII - (199)
Audi RS2 - (201)
Subaru Impreza WRX STi - (207)
Vauxhall VX220 Turbo - (215)
Lotus Elise R - (223)

http://westfield-world.com/power-to-weight.html

This is what comes up if I were to gain 30hp at the flywheel and get my car weight down to 900kg...need to re-weigh me-thinks! :D
Jaguar XKR R - (234)
Maserati 3200GT - (237)
Lotus Exige (S1) - (247)
Mercedes CLS55 AMG - (252)
Aston Martin DB9 Volante - (260)
Porsche 911 GT3 (996) mk1 - (271
1989 NA 1650
1998 NB 1800
2005 NC 2000
1990 Landcruiser
Surfboard
Push-bike
Hiking shoes

marcellarius
I count 5-s in my sleep
I count 5-s in my sleep
Posts: 367
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:52 pm
Location: Hamiltron

Post by marcellarius » Fri Jul 05, 2013 7:47 pm

Strange. The calculator doesn't work for me.

Have you seen this http://www.lightweightmiata.com/beast/lightness/ ... it has a list of rough weights (in pounds) of parts removed from the car.

Not many things on there that I'd want to do to a daily driver, maybe remove the A/C because it seems to do little but get in the way of maintenance tasks on my car.

WideOpenThrottle
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1293
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:35 am
Location: 36.8167° S, 174.4167° E

Post by WideOpenThrottle » Fri Jul 05, 2013 8:07 pm

Try the home page

http://westfield-world.com/index.html

go to tools and on the drop-down menu go to weight reduction then click on calculator & try again.
1989 NA 1650
1998 NB 1800
2005 NC 2000
1990 Landcruiser
Surfboard
Push-bike
Hiking shoes

Donovan
I only think 5.
I only think 5.
Posts: 917
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:05 pm
Location: Auckland

Post by Donovan » Sun Jul 07, 2013 4:48 pm

Isn't BHP at the wheels horsepower, rather than the flywheel.

If I use the calculator using my at the wheel rating, I get the same list as you WOT.

If I do the flywheel rating (as it says on the site), well, it's a slightly different matter, and I guess about right, as I have dusted an ML65 and an M5 in a straight line easily (well, wheels still still smoking it up)

BMW M5 (E60) - (278)
Ferrari 550 Maranello - (287)
Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG - (295)
Porsche 911 GT3 RS - (997) (302)
Porsche 959 - (315)
TVR T350C - (318)

WideOpenThrottle
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1293
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:35 am
Location: 36.8167° S, 174.4167° E

Post by WideOpenThrottle » Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:00 am

The Calculator asks for flywheel HP so that's what I have put in the box...I suppose wheel hp would be better as some cars lose more than others through the drive-line!
And most car manufacturers rate it at the flywheel as it is higher than the hub and better for marketing purposes.
1989 NA 1650
1998 NB 1800
2005 NC 2000
1990 Landcruiser
Surfboard
Push-bike
Hiking shoes

Post Reply

Return to “MX5 Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests